Evidence Hub

Modafinil Ameliorated Fibromyalgia Syndrome in Rats by Modulating Mast Cells and Microglia Activation Through Dopamine/Substance P/MRGPRX/Histamine and PI3K/p-Akt/NF-κB Signaling Pathways

Mennat-Allah M. Kamal, Reham M. Essam, Noha F. Abdelkader, Hala Fahmy Zaki

Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is characterized by prolonged, widespread musculoskeletal pain accompanied by various physical and psychological disturbances. Modafinil, a wake-promoting drug, manages pain symptoms in several diseases by inhibiting dopamine reuptake and exhibiting anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, including the impairment of cytokine production, microglia, and mast cell activation. Central inflammation may involve microglial activation, which is correlated with mast cell activation. Restoring dopamine levels and modulating the communication between mast cells and microglia may represent a promising approach to managing pain symptoms in FMS. Thus, this study intended to explore the interplay between brain mast cells and microglia as an underlying mechanism in the pathophysiology of FMS and how this interaction is controlled by modafinil, with a focus on dopamine/SP/MRGPRX2/histamine and PI3K/p-Akt/NF-κB signaling pathways. Rats were arbitrarily distributed between 4 groups. Group 1 served as normal control. Reserpine (1 mg/kg/day; s.c) was injected into the remaining groups for three consecutive days. In groups 3 and 4, modafinil (100 mg/kg/day; p.o) was administered either alone or in conjunction with haloperidol (1 mg/kg/day; ip), respectively, for the following 21 days. Modafinil ameliorated reserpine-induced thermal/mechanical allodynia (1.3-fold, 2.3-fold) and hyperalgesia (0.5-fold), attenuated depression (0.5-fold), and enhanced motor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a book / chapter, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free