Evidence Hub

Impact of hepatic steatosis on the efficacy of antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B and the establishment of predictive model: a cohort study

Guanghui Ren, Kaining Jia, Yin Shi, Yunpeng Guan, Qingwei Cong, Ying Zhu

Virology Journal, 2025

320 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

AIM: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic disease (MASLD) and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are prevalent liver disorders. Ongoing discussions investigate the impact of MASLD on the therapeutic outcomes of CHB. METHODS: A cohort of 320 CHB patients on antiviral therapy (including NAs and PEG IFNα) were included and categorized into CHB + MASLD (n = 125) and CHB group (n = 195). The treatment response rates, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression were assessed between the two groups to investigate the impact of MASLD on antiviral responses in patients with CHB. RESULTS: At weeks 24 and 48, the CHB + MASLD group displayed a higher HBsAg response rate than the CHB group (24 weeks: 11.5% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.026; 48 weeks: 24.4% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.001). The pgRNA response was also higher in the CHB + MASLD group at both time points (24 weeks: 30.9% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.163; 48 weeks: 48.8% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.049). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a shorter median time to HBsAg response at 48 weeks for the CHB + MASLD group (HR = 3.251, 40 weeks vs. 42.5 weeks, p = 0.002). This is particularly evident among individuals who are negative for HBeAg (48w: 24.2% vs 12.2%, p = 0.005). KM survival analysis demonstrated that the CHB + MASLD group was more likely to achieve HBsAg response (HR = 2.428, p = 0.039).COX regression analysis identified age (HR = 0.948, p = 0.005), antiviral regimen (NAs + PEG IFNα: HR = 5.33, p < 0.001; PEG IFNα: HR = 1.099, p = 0.93), baseline HBsAg…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 320 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free