Evidence Hub

Creatine transporter deficient rat model show motor dysfunction, cerebellar alterations and muscle creatine deficiency without muscle atrophy

Lara Duran-Trio, Gabriella Fernandes-Pires, Jocelyn Grosse, Inés Soro-Arnáiz, Clothilde Roux-Petronelli, Pierre-Alain Binz, Katrien De Bock, Cristina Cudalbu et al.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 2021

Abstract

ABSTRACT Creatine (Cr) is a nitrogenous organic acid and plays roles as fast phosphate energy buffer to replenish ATP, osmolyte, antioxidant, neuromodulator, and as a compound with anabolic and ergogenic properties in muscle. Cr is taken from the diet or endogenously synthetized by the enzymes AGAT and GAMT, and specifically taken up by the transporter SLC6A8. Loss-of-function mutations in the genes encoding for the enzymes or the transporter cause Cerebral Creatine Deficiency Syndromes (CCDS). CCDS are characterized by brain Cr deficiency, intellectual disability with severe speech delay, behavioral troubles, epilepsy and motor dysfunction. Among CCDS, the X-linked Cr transporter deficiency (CTD) is the most prevalent with no efficient treatment so far. Different animal models of CTD show reduced brain Cr levels, cognitive deficiencies and together they cover other traits similar to those of patients. However, motor function was poorly explored in CTD models and some controversies in the phenotype exist in comparison with CTD patients. Our recently described Slc6a8 Y389C knock-in (KI) rat model of CTD showed mild impaired motor function, morphological alterations in cerebellum, reduced muscular mass, Cr deficiency and increased guanidinoacetate content in muscle, although no consistent signs of muscle atrophy. Our results indicate that such motor dysfunction co-occurred with both nervous and muscle dysfunction, suggesting that muscle strength and performance as well as…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free