Evidence Hub

The Effect of Empagliflozin on Left Ventricular Mass and Myocardial Extracellular Volume in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease

Tamique Mason

TSpace (University of Toronto), 2020

97 participants

Abstract

Background: The sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and established CV disease (CVD) but the mechanism driving their cardio-benefit remains poorly understood. Specifically, whether SGLT2 inhibitors have direct cardiac effects remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMi) and myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) in individuals with T2DM and CVD. Method: We randomized 97 participants with T2DM and CVD to receive empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 6 months in addition to standard of care therapy. The primary outcome was change in LVMi from baseline to 6 months determined by cardiac magnetic resonance. Other outcomes included change in indexed LV end diastolic volume (LVEDVi), end systolic volume (LVESVi) or ejection fraction (LVEF) and in circulating N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponin I. For our sub-study with 74 participants we assessed ECV, indexed intracellular and extracellular compartment volume (iICV, iECV), the fibrosis biomarkers soluble suppressor of tumorgenicity (sST2) and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2). Results: In the primary study, change in LVMi from baseline to 6-months was -2·6 (7·8) g/m2 for the empagliflozin group and -0·01 (5·7) g/m2 for placebo (adjusted difference between groups -3·4 g/m2; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), -5·9 to -0·8;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 97 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free