The cost-effectiveness of oral triptan therapy in Sweden
Abstract
The literature suggests that triptans are cost effective compared with older types of migraine treatment. However, which of the triptans that is most cost effective has not been established. We compared the costs and effects of triptan treatment from a Swedish societal perspective, using evidence from the literature. A probabilistic cost-effectiveness model was constructed to investigate the costs and effects of treating a single attack in a typical migraine patient. The end-point used in the base-case analysis was sustained pain free without any adverse events (SNAE). We searched the scientific literature for meta-analyses reporting the efficacy of oral triptans. All treatments except rizatriptan 10 mg and eletriptan 40 mg were dominated. The incremental cost per SNAE of rizatriptan 10 mg compared with eletriptan 40 mg was approximately 100 euro. There was substantial uncertainty concerning the results, but probabilistic analysis showed that rizatriptan 10 mg and eletriptan 40 mg had the highest probability of being cost-effective.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide association for migraine in six population-based European cohorts
- New and sex-specific migraine susceptibility loci identified from a multiethnic genome-wide meta-analysis
- microRNA profiling in atherosclerosis, diabetes, and migraine
- Genome‐Wide‐Associated Variants in Migraine Susceptibility: A Replication Study From North I ndia
- Pharmacoinformatics elucidation of potential drug targets against migraine to target ion channel protein KCNK18
- Upregulation of IL-1 Receptor Antagonist in a Mouse Model of Migraine
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.