Evidence Hub

Rapid assays for fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chang KC, Yew WW, Chan RC

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2010

41 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis has emerged as a global health threat. Given poor treatment outcomes of fluoroquinolone-resistant multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, there is a pressing need for rapid drug susceptibility testing of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis against fluoroquinolones. This review aims at evaluating these rapid assays.

METHODS: PubMed and OvidSP were used to search MEDLINE and EMBASE for publications in English regarding rapid assays that tested ofloxacin, levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. Studies were included only in the concurrent presence of sensitivity and specificity data. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were generated by the bivariate random effects model when there were at least three sets of data under the same assay category that tested the same fluoroquinolone with reference to a standard test.

RESULTS: Of 108 articles identified, 24 articles were included in a meta-analysis of rapid assays that tested ofloxacin in culture isolates. Overall, rapid genotypic assays targeting gyrA only are significantly less specific (96% versus 99%) and non-significantly less sensitive (88% versus 94%) than rapid phenotypic assays. To test for the presence or absence of ofloxacin resistance to a certainty threshold of 90%, the required pre-test prevalence ranges of ofloxacin resistance for genotypic assays targeting gyrA only are 29%-47% overall, 36%-55% for PCR-DNA sequencing and 23%-44% for others. Corresponding ranges…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free