Evidence Hub

Use of the biomarker score in determining the risk of heart failure in diabetics in Goma, North Kivu in the Democractic Republic of the Congo

Ng'ekieb Mukoso F, Natuhoyila Nkodila A, Nani Tuma Situakibanza H, Okitotsho Wembonyama S, Kibendelwa Tsongo Z

International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2024

408 participants

Abstract

Background: The use of biomarkers, such as N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTpBNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and high-sensitivity troponin (hs-TnI) is an alternative approach to detect the risk of heart failure (HF), but data on this approach are fragmentary in sub-Saharan Africa. The objective of this study is to determine the correlation between the risk of heart failure and the score of biomarkers in the population of asymptomatic diabetics in the city of GOMA.

Methods: Asymptomatic diabetics in the city of Goma were cross-sectionally recruited at the Center of the Association of Diabetics in Congo (ADIC) in Goma, DRC during the period from February 5 to 19, 2023. The risk of insufficiency heart rate at 5 years was determined using pulse pressure. The biomarker score was calculated using NTproBNP, hs-CRP, hs-troponin and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The association between the risk of heart failure and the biomarker score was evaluated using the logistic regression test at the threshold of p < 0.05.

Results: Of a total of 408 diabetic patients examined, 29.9% had presented a risk of heart failure. The risk of heart failure was higher in patients with a high biomarker score (57.7%), in patients with type 1 diabetes (60%) and in patients with type 2 diabetes (57.1%). Independent risk of biomarker score on occurrence of heart failure. The risk of heart failure was multiplied by 2 if the biomarker score was intermediate (OR: 2.19, 95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 408 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free