Evidence Hub

Influence of endpoint definitions on the effect of empagliflozin on major renal outcomes in the EMPEROR‐Preserved trial

M. Packer, F. Zannad, J. Butler, G. Filippatos, J. Ferreira, S. Pocock, M. Brueckmann, C. Zeller et al.

European Journal of Heart Failure, 2021

27 citations

Abstract

Large-scale trials have evaluated the effects of treatments on major renal outcomes, but the definition of a renal event has varied from trial to trial. In defining a renal event, trialists included patients who needed renal replacement therapy or whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declined to 40% were randomly assigned to placebo or empagliflozin for a median of 26 months. Empagliflozin reduced the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization by 21% [hazard ratio 0.79 (95% CI 0.69–0.90)] and decreased total (first and recurrent) hospitalizations for heart failure by 27% [hazard ratio 0.73 (95% CI 0.61–0.88)].3 When the influence of baseline ejection fraction on these results was evaluated according to prespecified subgroups of 41–49%, 50–59% and ≥60%, baseline ejection fraction did not influence the effect of empagliflozin on the primary endpoint. However, ejection fraction did influence the effect of empagliflozin on total hospitalizations for heart failure (Ptrend = 0.008), with an attenuated effect in patients with an ejection fraction ≥60%.4 In contrast to these favourable effects of empagliflozin on heart failure outcomes in EMPEROR-Preserved, empagliflozin did not exert a favourable effect on major renal outcomes using the EMPEROR definition,5 which relied on a threshold of a sustained ≥40% decrease in eGFR and did not include the occurrence of renal death. The hazard ratio for the effect of empagliflozin on major renal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free