Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and safety of tuberculosis preventive treatment for contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhou G, Luo S, He J, Chen N, Zhang Y, Cai S, Guo X, Chen H et al.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2024

1,105 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are at risk of developing TB disease. Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is an intervention that can potentially reduce this risk.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TPT for contacts of patients with MDR-TB.

DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies on 24 July 2023, without start date restrictions.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies that compared TPT with no treatment in contacts of patients with MDR-TB and reported outcomes of progression to TB disease.

PARTICIPANTS: Contacts of patients with MDR-TB.

INTERVENTIONS: TPT.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Random-effects meta-analysis was utilized to calculate the relative risk for disease progression to TB in contacts of patients with MDR-TB who received TPT compared to those who did not. Additionally, completion, adverse effect, and discontinued rates were assessed.

RESULTS: Involving 1105 individuals from 11 studies, the pooled relative risk for disease progression in contacts receiving TPT versus those without treatment was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.16-0.72). Subgroup analysis indicated a lower pooled relative risk for regimens based on the drug-resistance profile of the index patients with TB compared to uniform treatment regimens (0.22 [95% CI: 0.06-0.84] vs. 0.49 [95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,105 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free