Evidence Hub

Reply: Aspirin and GLP-1RAs—The missing confounders of empagliflozin for MASLD without diabetes mellitus?

Ka Shing Cheung, Wai K. Leung

Hepatology, 2024

98 participants

Abstract

We thank Hu et al1 for their letter commenting on our recent article “Effect of empagliflozin on liver fat in metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease patients without diabetes mellitus: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.”2 They commented that aspirin3 and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists4 may act as confounding factors on the causality of empagliflozin reducing hepatic steatosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease without diabetes mellitus. As it was a randomized study, all this information was available, and we reviewed the records of the 98 study participants. There were 11 (11.2%) aspirin users with 5 (10.2%) in the empagliflozin group, and 6 (12.2%) in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.749). There was, however, no glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist user as this study only included patients without diabetes, in which glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist was only approved for this indication locally. However, we did not think subgroup analysis based on aspirin use was meaningful as this study was not powered to explore this. In fact, a properly conducted randomized controlled study would be able to eliminate both measured and unmeasured confounders, including what has been proposed by the authors.1

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free