Evidence Hub

SGLT receptors and myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury: inhibition of SGLT-1, SGLT-2, or both?

Álvaro García‐Ropero, Carlos G. Santos‐Gallego, Juan J. Badimón

Cardiovascular Research, 2019

8 citations

Abstract

This editorial refers to ‘Cardiac sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 1 is a novel mediator of ischaemia/reperfusion injury’, by Z. Li et al., pp. 1646–1658. The publication of three randomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrating significant improvement in cardiovascular death among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients receptors1–3 sparkled interest in the SGLT receptors.4 These cardiac benefits were mostly achieved by a significant reduction in heart failure re-hospitalizations without impact on ischaemic events (myocardial infarction or stroke). The fast separation of the event curves in these trials (within the first 2–3 months) supports the existence of a mechanism unrelated to their glucose-lowering effect5,6; in fact, we have demonstrated that the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin ameliorates heart failure and enhances myocardial energetic status via a shift in the myocardial sources of metabolism from glucose towards fatty acids, ketone bodies, and branched-chain aminoacids.7 However, most of the research is focused on SGLT receptors and heart failure, while ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury has not received attention. Li et al.8 aim is to focus on this unexplored topic of the effect of SGLT receptors and myocardial I/R. SGLT receptors are simporters of glucose and sodium (moving both molecules in the same direction); they obtain energy to transport glucose against a concentration gradient by coupling it to the downhill Na+ electromechanical gradient.4,5…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free