Evidence Hub

Association of Tumor Pathological Response with the Use of Metformin During Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal and Esophageal/Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sakamoto K, Okabayashi K, Matsui S, Seishima R, Shigeta K, Kitagawa Y

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022

2,041 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: Metformin has been reported to be associated with improved cancer prognosis when used in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In this study, we present a systematic review and meta-analyses of studies evaluating the association of tumor pathological response with the use of metformin during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in rectal and esophageal/gastroesophageal cancer patients.

METHODS: We systematically searched databases for articles that compared concurrent metformin use with no metformin use in cancer patients treated with NACRT following the PRISMA 2020. The design and quality of the collected studies were reviewed, and meta-analyses were performed on the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, tumor regression grade (TRG), T factor downstaging, and N factor downstaging.

RESULTS: Three databases were searched, and 220 papers were screened. Five retrospective cohort study papers were eligible for the meta-analysis, with a total of 2041 patients. The included papers contained only rectal and esophageal/gastroesophageal cancers. In the metformin group, the pCR rate was 26% [20-32%], and metformin was associated with the pCR rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51 [0.34-0.76], p < 0.01). Meta-regression analysis of the pCR rate showed a positive correlation with adenocarcinoma (coefficient = 0.13 [0.02-0.25], p = 0.03) and fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug use (coefficient = 0.01 [0.001-0.02], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that metformin is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,041 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free