Evidence Hub

Sex differences in the risk of metformin-associated gastrointestinal adverse events: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kumar A, Catalano A, Biamonte E, Pintaudi B, Nieminen P, Singh S

Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2026

7,968 participants

Abstract

Evidence regarding sex-related differences in metformin-associated gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs) remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether sex influences the risk of metformin-associated GIAEs. We included observational studies (5 cohorts and 1 case-control) and a randomized controlled trial identified through searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to June 2026. Eligible studies reported metformin-associated GIAEs separately in females and males, while studies in which GIAEs could not be attributed to metformin were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Seven studies (five cohort studies, one case-control study, and one randomized controlled trial) involving 7,968 participants (3,106 females and 4,862 males) were included. Females had significantly higher odds of metformin-associated GIAEs than males (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.58-2.17), with consistent findings in sensitivity analyses. Females may have a higher risk of metformin-associated GIAEs than males, highlighting the importance of considering sex differences when prescribing metformin and monitoring gastrointestinal intolerance.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,968 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free