Evidence Hub

Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of antibiotics used to treat nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacilli: A systematic review

Heffernan AJ, Sime FB, Lipman J, Dhanani J, Andrews K, Ellwood D, Grimwood K, Roberts JA

International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2019

67 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of antibiotic concentrations achievable in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) will help guide antibiotic dosing for treating patients with Gram-negative bacillary ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

OBJECTIVE

To compare: (1) the ELF:serum penetration ratio of antibiotics in patients with pneumonia, including VAP, with that in healthy study participants; and (2) the ELF and/or tracheal aspirate antibiotic concentrations following intravenous and nebuliser delivery.

METHODS

Web of Science, EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched and a systematic review undertaken.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies were identified. ELF penetration ratios for aminoglycosides and most β-lactam antibiotics administered intravenously were between 0.12 and 0.57, whereas intravenous colistin may be undetectable in the ELF. In contrast, estimated mean fluoroquinolone ELF penetration ratios of up to 1.31 were achieved. Importantly, ELF penetration ratios appear reduced in critically ill patients with pneumonia compared with in healthy volunteers receiving intravenous ceftazidime, levofloxacin and fosfomycin; thus, dose adjustment is likely to be required in critically ill patients. In contrast to the systemic administration route, nebulisation of antibiotics achieves high ELF concentrations. Nebulised 400 mg twice-daily amikacin resulted in a median peak ELF steady-state concentration of 976.01 mg/L (interquartile range 410.3-2563.1 mg/L). Similarly, nebulised 1 million international…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free