Evidence Hub

Implementation and Evaluation of the "Metformin First" Protocol for Management of Gestational Diabetes

Kumar R, Lowe J, Thompson-Hutchison F, Steinberg D, Shah B, Lipscombe L, Halperin I

Canadian journal of diabetes, 2019

264 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although metformin has traditionally been avoided in pregnancy, evidence now supports its safety and efficacy for management of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of a metformin-based approach for GDM management through assessment of pregnancy outcomes, clinic efficiency and patient satisfaction.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of new GDM patients seen before (January to July 2015) and after (January to September 2016) implementation of the "Metformin First" (MF) protocol. A prospective patient survey was also administered and responses were compared with a similar survey from 2013 (acting as a historical control).

RESULTS: Of the 264 patients included in the chart review, 90 were seen in the pre-MF period and 174 in the post-MF period. There were no significant differences in rates of pregnancy complications (obstructed labour, infants born large for gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit admissions and infant hypoglycemia) between the 2 study periods. Blood glucose control was also comparable and satisfactory across both time periods. Of the 65 patients initially started on metformin, 18 (28%) required supplemental insulin therapy. Nonetheless, overall percentage of patients started on insulin dropped significantly (33% in 2015 vs 17% in 2016, p=0.003). Patient satisfaction scores at the clinic also increased following implementation of the MF protocol (4.68/5…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 264 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free