Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Gliclazide versus Glimepiride in T2DM Patients: A Systematic Review

Bansal R, Kant R, Bahurupi Y, Gupta A

Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 2025

Abstract

This systematic review compares the efficacy and safety of gliclazide and glimepiride in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases, including PubMed and Cochrane Library, to identify relevant randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Five studies were included based on pre-defined eligibility criteria, focussing on glycaemic control (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and post-prandial blood glucose) and safety outcomes like hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular events. Data were extracted and synthesised using established systematic review methodologies, and risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane tools. Both gliclazide and glimepiride effectively reduced HbA1c, but gliclazide showed a lower risk of hypoglycaemia. However, elderly patients using gliclazide had an increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia and fractures. This review indicates that while both drugs are effective, gliclazide may have a safer profile in middle-aged adults, with glimepiride potentially being a better option for older adults.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free