Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Weight-Lowering Agents on Fat Distribution: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Qiao X, Wang W, Cao J, Guo L, Pan Q

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2026

2,741 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Pharmacotherapy offers a potential solution for individuals with overweight and obesity to decrease their body weight. However, there is limited knowledge of the effects of antiobesity agents on the distribution of body fat.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of weight-lowering drugs between inception and May 23, 2023. The main results were visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT). Secondary outcomes were altered body weights and waist circumferences. For the statistical analysis, STATA 14.0 was utilized, and the frequentist method was used for random-effect network meta-analyses.

Results: A total of 39 articles including 41 RCTs with 2741 patients were included. GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors were observed to lower VAT (-0.90 [-1.32 to -0.47] and -0.66 [-1.22 to -0.10]) after a mean of 29.4 weeks, whereas only GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced SAT (-1.01 [-1.58 to -0.43]). Naltrexone-bupropion, GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and metformin were found to reduce body weight (-5.60 [-8.64 to -2.56] kg, -4.73 [-5.58 to -3.88] kg, -3.20 [-4.69 to -1.72] kg, and -1.93 [-3.01 to -0.85] kg). Lastly, waist circumference was decreased by GLP-1 receptor agonists, metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and naltrexone-bupropion.

Conclusion: This analysis demonstrated that GLP-1 receptor agonists may have advantages over other antiobesity agents in reducing VAT and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,741 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free