Evidence Hub

Genome-wide association studies in chronic venous disease: A systematic review

Soh CL, Tan M, Davies AH, Onida S

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2026

602,760 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Chronic venous disease (CVD) arises from venous hypertension secondary to impaired venous return, causing significant morbidity and diminished quality of life. Genetic factors are likely important in the pathogenesis and susceptibility of a patient to develop CVD. This systematic review summarizes genome-wide association studies (GWASs) that investigate the link between genetic variants and CVD.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, with the search dates ranging from January 1, 1994, to July 17, 2025. Abstract and full-text screening were completed by two independent reviewers, with any conflicts referred to a third senior reviewer. GWASs in adults investigating links between genetic variants and CVD were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with venous thromboembolism, arterial or diabetic disease, or animal models.

Results: Thirteen studies were included after screening 517 studies from a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid. Database sources included UK Biobank, FinnGen, PopGen, and country- or hospital-specific databases with a majority Caucasian and European patient cohort. A total of 602,760 patients were identified with varicose veins and 3,664,604 control cases that were studied with GWASs and other statistical methods including a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach, functional mapping, and genetic correlations. A variety of statistically significant genetic polymorphisms were identified that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 602,760 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free