Evidence Hub

Metformin use linked to decreased risk of pelvic organ prolapse: insights from NHANES data

Du Z, Tian Z, Fu L, Wang X, Wang X, Xu T, Sun Z

International urology and nephrology, 2026

9,344 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Preclinical evidence suggests that metformin may mitigate pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by altering the gene expression of human vaginal fibroblasts in a beneficial direction, but clinical validation is lacking. This study aimed to explore the association between metformin use and POP risk.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2005 to 2012. POP was defined by self-reported vaginal bulging. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between metformin use and POP in high-risk subgroups (hypertension or smoking), with adjustments for demographic, comorbidity, and obstetric/gynecologic factors. Associations between inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers and POP were also analyzed.

Results: Three hundred and thirty of 9344 included women reported POP. Among 668 metformin users (630 with diabetes, 36 with prediabetes), 37 had POP. (Pre)diabetes was a risk factor for POP (OR = 1.52, P = 0.007). POP prevalence was lower in metformin-treated (pre)diabetes subgroups with hypertension (OR = 0.32, P = 0.045) or smoking (OR = 0.09, P = 0.022), independent of glycemic control, while thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and insulin did not show the effect. C-reactive protein was higher in POP individuals (0.56 ± 0.98 mg/dL vs. 0.44 ± 0.73 mg/dL) and associated with POP (OR = 1.30, P = 0.020), especially in smokers (OR = 1.50, P = 0.002), but not in metformin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 9,344 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free