Evidence Hub

Preclinical Rat Models in Oral Implant Dentistry: A Scoping Review of Study Design and Experimental Practices

Podda GM, Borghetti L, De Siati C, Galvez P, Romeo U, Catros S

Dentistry journal, 2026

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread clinical use of dental implants, research in implant dentistry remains active, aiming to develop new materials, designs, and surface morphologies, as well as to better understand the biological mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of certain diseases to improve patient outcomes. In this context, preclinical animal models provide an essential opportunity to explore and validate new technologies and protocols before their application in humans. Although large vertebrate species have historically been preferred due to their biological similarity to humans, small animal models such as rats offer significant advantages. Additionally, they allow researchers to work with larger sample sizes, improving the statistical power of experimental outcomes. This scoping review aimed to analyze the current literature on intraoral rat surgical models in the field of implant dentistry. Methods: We included the preclinical studies using rat models focused on implant placement in the oral cavity and published in English. We excluded all studies that involved animal models other than rats or used implant placements in anatomical sites different from the target region. An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases. From an initial 1032 results, 680 articles remained after duplicate removal. A first screening retained 191 articles, and after full-text review, 98 studies were ultimately included. The selection process was conducted…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free