Evidence Hub

Multiple-dose safety and pharmacokinetics of oral garenoxacin in healthy subjects

Gajjar DA, Bello A, Ge Z, Christopher L, Grasela DM

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2003

43 citations

Abstract

Garenoxacin (T-3811ME, BMS-284756) is a novel des-F(6) quinolone that has been shown to be effective in vitro against a wide range of clinically important pathogens, including gram-positive and gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple oral doses (100 to 1200 mg/day) of garenoxacin in healthy subjects and to determine its multiple-dose pharmacokinetics. Forty healthy male and female subjects (18 to 45 years of age) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential, multiple- and ascending-dose study. Each subject received a once-daily oral dose of garenoxacin (100, 200, 400, 800, or 1200 mg) or a placebo for 14 days. Blood and urine samples were collected for measurements of garenoxacin by validated liquid chromatography with dual mass spectrometry, and plasma garenoxacin concentration-time data were analyzed by noncompartmental methods. The effects of garenoxacin on Helicobacter pylori, psychometric test performance, and electrocardiograms were assessed, as was drug safety. Over the 14 days of dosing, geometric mean peak concentrations of garenoxacin in plasma (C(max)) at the 100- and 1200-mg doses were within the ranges of 1.2 to 1.6 and 16.3 to 24 microg/ml, respectively. The corresponding values for the geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC(tau)) for garenoxacin in plasma at the 100- and 1200-mg doses were within the ranges…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free