Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Intravenous Moxifloxacin in Pediatric Patients: Dose Optimization in a Phase 1 Study

Stass H, Lettieri J, Vanevski KM, Willmann S, James LP, Sullivan JE, Arrieta AC, Bradley JS

Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019

31 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of moxifloxacin were characterized in 31 pediatric patients already receiving antibiotics for a suspected or proven infection in an open-label phase 1 study. A dosing strategy for each age cohort (Cohort 1: ≥6 years to ≤14 years; Cohort 2: ≥2 years to 3 month to <2 years) was developed using physiology-based pharmacokinetic modeling combined with a stepwise dosing scheme to obtain a similar exposure to adults receiving 400 mg of moxifloxacin. Doses, adjusted to body weight and age, were gradually escalated from 5 mg/kg in Cohort 1 to 10 mg/kg in Cohort 3 based on interim analysis of the pharmacokinetic and safety data. Plasma and urine samples before and after the 60-minute infusion were collected for the analysis of moxifloxacin and its metabolites using a validated high-pressure liquid chromatography assay with tandem mass spectrometry. Moxifloxacin and metabolite concentrations in plasma were within the ranges observed in adults; however, clearance of all analytes was lower in pediatric patients compared with adults. Population pharmacokinetic analyses using the achieved exposure levels in the 3 age cohorts (with known body weight and clearance) predicted similar efficacy and safety profiles to adults. Moxifloxacin was well tolerated in all pediatric age cohorts. Adverse events related to moxifloxacin were mild or moderate in intensity and showed no correlation with increased weight-adjusted doses. Our…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 31 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free