Evidence Hub

Optimal dose finding of garenoxacin based on population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and Monte Carlo simulation

Tanigawara Y, Nozawa K, Tsuda H

European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012

136 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Garenoxacin, a novel des-F(6)-quinolone, possesses potent antibacterial activity against infectious pathogens in the respiratory tract. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling and Monte Carlo simulations were used to optimize garenoxacin dosage regimens.

Methods: At the end of phase II stage, the clinical dose of garenoxacin was predicted to be 400 mg once daily by the interim PK/PD analysis using phase I and phase II clinical data. The criteria used to determine an optimal dose were (1) the target attainment of the area under the unbound concentration-time curve divided by the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC₀₋₂₄/MIC ratio) and (2) the maintenance of a trough concentration above the mutant prevention concentration. In a confirmatory phase III study, garenoxacin was administered 400 mg once daily to 136 patients infected with mild or moderate chronic respiratory diseases.

Results: Logistic regression analysis showed that fAUC₀₋₂₄/MIC ratio was a significant variable that predicted clinical response (p = 0.0164). Of all subjects, 92.4% reached the target value of fAUC₀₋₂₄/MIC ratio > 30 h, and the clinical efficacy rate of this population was 91.8%. On the other hand, there was no significant relationship between exposure values (AUC₀₋₂₄ and maximum concentration) and the incidence of adverse events by the Mann-Whitney test.

Conclusions: The antimicrobial efficacy of the actual phase III study was consistent with the expectation from the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 136 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free