Evidence Hub

Assessment of In Vitro Tests as Predictors of the Antioxidant Effects of Insulin, Metformin, and Taurine in the Brain of Diabetic Rats

George J Clark, Kashyap G. Pandya, C. Lau-cam

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2022

1 citation

Abstract

Hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress is an intrinsic feature of diabetes mellitus and a recognized causative factor of complications associated with the disease. As a result, compounds possessing antioxidant properties are commonly investigated as possible ways of minimizing and even preventing diabetes-related oxidative stress. On these premises, the present study was carried out to investigate the antioxidant properties of metformin (MET), a common oral hypoglycemic agent, of taurine (TAU), a sulfonic acid compound with known antioxidant benefits in diabetes, and of insulin (INS), a standard antidiabetic serving as a reference compound, by using in vitro and in vivo tests. A battery of seven in vitro tests was used to assess antioxidant/antiradical activity. The addition of a treatment compound led to a mean percentage decrease of values for free radical/lipid peroxidation (LPO) that ranged from very high (82%) with INS to moderate (43%) with MET) and to low (31%) with TAU. Combining MET with TAU leads to an improvement of the effect seen with MET alone (46%). By contrast, under the same conditions, N-acetylcysteine, a known antioxidant, was more potent (92%) than any of the test compounds. In vivo studies were conducted using rats made diabetic with streptozotocin and treated with daily doses of INS, MET, TAU, and MET-TAU for 6 weeks. Among the test compounds, the greatest hypoglycemic effect was attained with INS (>90% decrease), followed by MET (~70% decrease), with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a book / chapter, done in animal and cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free