Evidence Hub

Selective copper(II) removal using molecularly imprinted alginate-metformin hydrogel beads: Mechanistic insights from isotherms, DFT and molecular docking

Fallah A, Oladipo AA, Khosravi F, Pirgalıoğlu S

International journal of biological macromolecules, 2025

Abstract

A copper(II)-imprinted hydrogel (Cu-Imp) was developed using sodium alginate and metformin hydrochloride to fabricate structurally selective polymeric beads for efficient Cu(II) removal from aqueous solutions. The imprinting strategy leveraged the coordination chemistry of Cu(II) with nitrogen donors from metformin and carboxylate groups from alginate to construct high-fidelity recognition sites. Experimental characterization confirmed morphological refinement (SEM), selective Cu uptake (EDX), and functional group interaction (FTIR). The Cu-Imp beads achieved a maximum adsorption capacity of 50.21 mg/g and a Cu(II) removal efficiency of 96.3 % at an initial concentration of 10 mg/L. Isotherm modeling indicated strong agreement with the Redlich-Peterson (R2 = 0.948) and Koble-Corrigan (R2 = 0.947) models, suggesting heterogeneous monolayer-multilayer adsorption. Kinetic analysis revealed pseudo-second-order and Elovich models as the best fit (R2 = 0.986-0.997), confirming chemisorption with a rate-limiting electron-sharing mechanism. Molecular docking revealed favorable Cu-OH binding orientations, while DFT calculations validated strong Cu-O/N coordination at pH 5.4, with an adsorption energy of -60.34 kcal/mol and a HOMO-LUMO gap of 0.087 eV, indicating high electronic reactivity. The material demonstrated excellent regeneration capacity, maintaining ~26.8 mg/g performance over five cycles. Together, these findings confirm the success of the molecular imprinting strategy and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free