Evidence Hub

Probiotics, synbiotics and berberine in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and molecular dynamics simulation study

Shadin M, Bhuia MS, Alfaifi M, Altemani FH, Altemani AH, Alsenani F, Saleh N, Islam MT

PloS one, 2026

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by impaired regulation of blood glucose. Probiotics, synbiotics, and berberine (BBR) have been proposed as adjunctive interventions, but their overall effectiveness remains uncertain.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of these interventions on glycemic control and to explore a potential molecular interaction of BBR with a key carbohydrate-digesting enzyme.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Pooled effects were estimated for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) using random-effects models. A subgroup analysis compared probiotics with placebo. An exploratory computational analysis examined the interaction of BBR with α-glucosidase.

Results: More than 30 trials involving over 2,000 participants were included. The pooled analysis showed significant but modest reductions in FPG (-0.71 mmol·L ⁻ ¹) and HbA1c (-0.19%), with substantial between-study variability. Probiotics alone also reduced FPG (approximately -0.80 mmol·L ⁻ ¹) and HbA1c (approximately -0.21%) compared with placebo. Computational analysis indicated weaker enzyme binding for BBR than for the reference inhibitor acarbose.

Conclusions: Probiotics, synbiotics, and BBR provide statistically significant but clinically modest improvements in glycemic control. These findings support their use as adjunctive, rather than primary, therapeutic options and highlight the need for larger and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free