Evidence Hub

Colorimetric Detection of Nitrosamines in Human Serum Albumin Using Cysteine-Capped Gold Nanoparticles

Fakayode SO, Bwambok DK, Banerjee S, Rai P, Okoth R, Kuiters C, Benjamin U

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Nitrosamines, including N-nitroso diethylamine (NDEA) have emerged as pharmaceutical impurities and carcinogenic environmental contaminants of grave public health safety concerns. This study reports on the preparation and first use of cysteine-gold nanoparticles (CysAuNPs) for colorimetric detection of NDEA in human serum albumin (HSA) under physiological conditions. Molecular docking (MD) and molecular dynamic simulation (MDS) were performed to probe the interaction between NDEA and serum albumin. UV-visible absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging were used to characterize the synthesized CysAuNPs. These CysAuNPs show a UV-visible absorbance wavelength maxima (λmax) at 377 nm and emission λmax at 623 nm. Results from DLS measurement revealed the CysAuNPs' uniform size distribution and high polydispersity index of 0.8. Microscopic imaging using TEM showed that CysAuNPs have spherical to nanoplate-like morphology. The addition of NDEA to HSA in the presence of CysAuNPs resulted in a remarkable increase in the absorbance of human serum albumin. The interaction of NDEA-CysAuNPs-HSA is plausibly facilitated by hydrogen bonding, sulfur linkages, or by Cys-NDEA-induced electrostatic and van der Waal interactions. These are due to the disruption of the disulfide bond linkage in Cys-Cys upon the addition of NDEA, causing the unfolding of the serum albumin and the dispersion of CysAuNPs. The combined…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free