Evidence Hub

Ternary Cobalt(II), Nickel(II), and Copper(II) complexes containing metformin and ethylenediamine: Synthesis, characterization, thermal, in vitro DNA binding, in silico molecular docking, and in vivo antihyperglycemic studies

K. Rajeshwari, P. V. Anantha Lakshmi, J. Archana, M. Sumakanth

Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2020

23 citations

Abstract

Three new water soluble ternary metal complexes, [Co(metf)(en) 2 ]Cl 2 (1) , [Ni(metf)(en) 2 ]Cl 2 (2) , and [Cu(metf)(en) 2 ]Cl 2 (3) , (Metf = metformin, en = ethylenediamine), were synthesized and characterized, and pharmacodynamic evaluation was reported. From the spectral analysis, octahedral geometry was proposed to all the three metal complexes. The Kinetic parameters have been determined by thermogravimetric data using Coats‐Redfern method. The stability of the complexes was obtained from their molecular orbital structures from which the quantum chemical parameters were calculated using the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)‐lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies. The DNA binding studies of these complexes were explored by absorption, emission, and viscosity. Groove mode of surface binding of these complexes with DNA was explained by viscosity studies. Nuclease activity exhibited by these complexes on pUC19 DNA was experimented by agarose gel electrophoresis. Discovery Studio 2.1 software was used for docking studies of these complexes into B‐DNA sequence, 5′(D*AP*CP*CP*GP*AP*CP*GP*TP*CP*GP*GP*T)‐3′ retrieved from protein data bank (PDB ID: 423D). The maximum score is seen for complex 1 . The antihyperglycemic activity of these complexes was studied in streptozotocin (STZ)‐diabetic rats. The substantial increase in the antihyperglycemic activity of the complexes is seen when compared with pure drug. The maximum antihyperglycemic activity is…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in animal and cell cultures (in vitro) and computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free