Evidence Hub

Salsalate, but not metformin or canagliflozin, slows kidney cyst growth in an adult-onset mouse model of polycystic kidney disease

Wouter N. Leonhard, Xuewen Song, Anish A. Kanhai, Ioan-Andrei Iliuta, Andrea Božović, Gregory R. Steinberg, Dorien J.M. Peters, York Pei

EBioMedicine, 2019

20 participants · 84 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple preclinical studies have highlighted AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as a potential therapeutic target for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Both metformin and canagliflozin indirectly activate AMPK by inhibiting mitochondrial function, while salsalate is a direct AMPK activator. Metformin, canagliflozin and salsalate (a prodrug dimer of salicylate) are approved for clinical use with excellent safety profile. Although metformin treatment had been shown to attenuate experimental cystic kidney disease, there are concerns that therapeutic AMPK activation in human kidney might require a higher oral metformin dose than can be achieved clinically. METHODS: In this study, we tested metformin-based combination therapies for their additive (metformin plus canagliflozin) and synergistic (metformin plus salsalate) effects and each drug individually in an adult-onset conditional Pkd1 knock-out mouse model (n = 20 male/group) using dosages expected to yield clinically relevant drug levels. FINDINGS: Compared to untreated mutant mice, treatment with salsalate or metformin plus salsalate improved kidney survival (i.e. blood urea nitrogen <20 mmol/L at the time of sacrifice) and reduced cystic kidney disease severity. However, the effects of metformin plus salsalate did not differ from salsalate alone; and neither metformin nor canagliflozin was effective. Protein expression and phosphorylation analyses indicated that salsalate treatment was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free