Evidence Hub

Enhancing the Efficacy of Metformin in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Clinical Trials

Fei Xie, Ting Jiang, Meng-Yi Qian, Xin-Yan Yu, Jia-Ni Ji, Endi Song

Cancer Control: Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Cente, 2025

474 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of increasing the use of metformin in neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer (BC) on the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) in patients. Methods A systematic search was conducted in four electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search scope covered all the literature from the establishment of the databases to April 2025. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The outcome indicator was the pCR rate. Result This meta-analysis included a total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 474 patients. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the pCR rate between the experimental group containing metformin and the control group (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: [0.85, 1.71], P = 0.28). Subgroup analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the pCR rate between the two groups in patients with metabolic syndrome (RR = 2.09, 95% CI [0.55, 7.85], P = 0.28), patients without metabolic syndrome (RR = 1.12, 95% CI [0.81, 1.55], P = 0.49), patients from Eastern countries (RR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.63, 2.11], P = 0.65), and patients from Western countries (RR = 1.32, 95% CI [0.75, 2.32], P = 0.34). Conclusion This study did not observe any effect of increasing the use of metformin on the pCR rate of patients in neoadjuvant treatment for BC.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 474 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free