Evidence Hub

Metformin versus sulphonylureas for new onset atrial fibrillation and stroke in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based study

Jiandong Zhou, Guoming Zhang, Carlin Chang, Oscar Hou In Chou, Sharen Lee, Keith Sai Kit Leung, Wing Tak Wong, Tong Liu et al.

Research Square, 2021

3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background To compare the rates of incident atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality between metformin and sulphonylurea users in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients receiving either sulphonylurea or metformin monotherapy between January 1 st , 2000 and December 31 st , 2019. The primary outcome was new-onset AF or stroke. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) between sulphonylurea and metformin users was performed, based on demographics, CHA-DS-VASc score, Charlson comorbidity index, past comorbidities, and medication use. Cox regression was used to identify significant risk factors. Competing risk analysis was conducted using cause-specific and subdistribution hazard models. Sensitivity analysis using propensity score stratification, high dimensional propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting were conducted. Results A total of 36228 sulphonylurea users and 72456 metformin users were included in the propensity score-matched cohort. Multivariable Cox regression showed that sulphonylurea users had higher risks of incident AF (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.75-2.77; P<0.0001), stroke (HR: 3.23, 95% CI: 3.01-3.45; P<0.0001), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 3.60, 95% CI: 2.62-4.81; P<0.0001), and all-cause…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free