Evidence Hub

Metformin in nucleus accumbens core reduces cue-induced cocaine seeking in male and female rats

Amy E. Chan, Alexis Willard, Sarah M. Mulloy, Noor Alhuda Kh. Ibrahim, Allegra Sciaccotta, Mark Schonfeld, Sade M. Spencer

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 2021

2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the potential therapeutic effects of the FDA-approved drug metformin on cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking. Metformin (dimethyl-biguanide) is a first-line treatment for type II diabetes that, among other mechanisms, is involved in the activation of adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK). Cocaine self-administration and extinction is associated with decreased levels of phosphorylated AMPK within the nucleus accumbens core (NAcore). Previously it was shown that increasing AMPK activity in the NAcore decreased cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking. Decreasing AMPK activity produced the opposite effect. The goal of the present study was to determine if metformin in the NAcore reduces cue-induced cocaine seeking in adult male and female Sprague Dawley rats. Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine followed by extinction prior to cue-induced reinstatement trials. Metformin microinjected in the NAcore attenuated cue-induced reinstatement in male and female rats. Importantly, metformin’s effects on cocaine seeking were not due to a general depression of spontaneous locomotor activity. In female rats, metformin’s effects did generalize to a reduction in cue-induced reinstatement of sucrose seeking. These data support a potential role for metformin as a pharmacotherapy for cocaine use disorder, but warrant caution given the potential for metformin’s effects to generalize to a natural reward in female rats.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free