Evidence Hub

Fluoroquinolone Susceptibility and Comparative Outcomes of Gram-negative Bloodstream Infection in Pediatric Patients With Hematologic Malignancy

Vasileiadi E, Elgarten CW, Getz KD, Aplenc R, Fisher BT

Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause morbidity and mortality in children with chemotherapy-associated neutropenia. While levofloxacin prophylaxis reduces BSI incidence, breakthrough infections occur in ~20%, often with fluoroquinolone non-susceptible (FQN-NS) gram-negative (GN) pathogens. The impact of FQN-NS on outcomes of GN BSI remains unknown. This study compares outcomes in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies following FQN-NS vs. fluoroquinolone-susceptible (FQN-S) GN BSI.

METHODS: A single-center cohort of pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies and neutropenia-associated GN BSI between 2014 and 2023 was retrospectively collected. The exposure was dichotomized as FQN-NS vs. FQN-S. Primary outcomes were intensive care unit admission and 30-day all-cause mortality, assessed from the day before to 30 days after blood culture collection. Modified Poisson regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates including age, calendar year of diagnosis, time from malignancy onset, cumulative neutropenia, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use, international status, relapse/refractory disease, and type of underlying hematologic malignancy. A subgroup analysis assessed effect modification by resistance to empiric therapy. Only 5 patients contributed multiple events; clustering adjustments were not made.

RESULTS: Among 119 GN BSI events, 82 (68.9%) were FQN-S and 37 (31.1%) FQN-NS. In…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free