Evidence Hub

Low penicillin susceptibility in Streptococcus mitis/oralis from bloodstream infections in pediatric populations

Zhou J-M, Wu C-Y, Li J-P, Ye Y-H, Fang C, Zhou M-M

Microbiology spectrum, 2024

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Streptococcus mitis/oralis can cause invasive diseases, including bloodstream infections. However, existing research primarily focuses on specific populations, and limited studies have been conducted on the prevalence of bloodstream infection caused by S. mitis/oralis across the entire pediatric population. Therefore, clinical data of S. mitis/oralis isolated from blood samples at Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, during the period 2019-2023 were collected retrospectively to provide a comprehensive understanding of the clinical characteristics and drug resistance patterns associated with bloodstream infections caused by S. mitis/oralis in pediatric populations. There were 57 (43.5%) instances of contamination across various departments, indicating a relatively dispersed pattern. Bloodstream infections caused by S. mitis/oralis are notably prevalent among pediatric patients with hematological diseases and tumors. The susceptibility rates of the 74 S. mitis/oralis isolates to different antibiotics were as follows: penicillin (23%), ceftriaxone (74.3%), levofloxacin (86.5%), chloramphenicol (89.2%), erythromycin (27%), clindamycin (67.6%), linezolid (100%), and vancomycin (100%). Notably, 21.6% of the isolates exhibited multi-drug resistance (MDR). The predominant mode of MDR in S. mitis/oralis infections was identified as resistance to β-lactams, erythromycin, and clindamycin. The observed low susceptibility rate to penicillin, coupled…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free