Evidence Hub

Distribution and Drug Resistance of Common Pathogens Causing Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Xinjiang Region

Wang L, Guo H, Qu L, Wang G, Luo J

Alternative therapies in health and medicine, 2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the composition and distribution of pathogenic bacteria in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) and their antimicrobial resistance patterns in a hospital in Xinjiang, to guide more effective antibiotic selection and inform clinical management.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 545 strains isolated from various clinical specimens like sputum and blood, collected between June 2020 and June 2023, using the LIST system. The strains were subjected to drug resistance testing, and statistical analyses included t tests and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS: Among gram-negative bacilli, Acinetobacter baumannii dominated, accounting for 32.11%, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, accounting for 18.35%. Among gram-positive bacteria, thrombin-negative staphylococcus was at the top of the list, followed by Staphylococcus aureus. Among Acinetobacter baumannii (AB), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii plays a dominant role. The sensitivity rate of these strains to tigecycline and amikacin could reach more than 80%. The sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) to piperacillin, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin ranged from 50% to 80%. It is worth mentioning that the sensitivity rate of PA to amikacin, cefoperazone, and tobramycin exceeded 80%. Amikacin was more than 60% sensitive to carbapenem, β-lactam inhibitors, tigecycline, quinolones, and aminoglycosides of ESBL producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Among…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free