Evidence Hub

RE: Statistical Interpretation Error in Metformin Trial Article

David Blair Allison

PEDIATRICS, 2017

4 citations

Abstract

The article by Dr Pastor-Villaescusa may make a valuable contribution to the literature if interpreted correctly. However, in its current form, it contains an important error of statistical inference.Specifically, the abstract states that “Metformin decreased the BMI z score and improved inflammatory and cardiovascular-related obesity parameters in prepubertal children but not in pubertal children. Hence, the differential response according to puberty might be related to the dose of metformin per kilogram of weight.”Yet, in contrast to the statement above, the body of the article states, “No differences were found in the impact of metformin according to the pubertal stage when the interaction time × treatment × puberty was applied to the entire population (P = .41).” Furthermore, Table 2 shows that the placebo-corrected reductions in BMI z score in the prepubertal and pubertal groups are, within the precision reported in the table, identical.In short, there is no evidence for a “differential response” by pubertal status, contradicting the authors’ conclusion statement. The authors have made a common but serious error of inference by neglecting the fact that “Difference in Nominal Significance is not a Significant Difference,” as has been described elsewhere.1,2The conclusion offered by the authors is not supported by the data and should be corrected.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free