Evidence Hub

Comment on: Rowan et al. Metformin in Gestational Diabetes: The Offspring Follow-Up (MiG TOFU): Body Composition at 2 Years of Age. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2279–2284

Linda A. Barbour, Rachael E. Van Pelt, David E. Brumbaugh, Teri L. Hernandez, Jacob E. Friedman

Diabetes Care, 2012

6 citations

Abstract

We applaud Dr. Rowan and the MiG TOFU (Metformin in Gestational diabetes: The Offspring Follow-Up) investigators for their intense efforts at following the 2-year offspring outcomes from the MiG trial (1). Understanding how in utero exposures impact longer-term offspring consequences is critical. However, we feel compelled to caution against overinterpretation of this study's findings.

Of note, 46% of the mothers in the metformin group required insulin to achieve adequate glycemic control (1); therefore, ∼50% in this group actually received both. Although 43% of the total infant cohort received anthropometric measures at 2 years, only ∼15% received dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, thus potentially biasing the results. The absence of any differences in the …

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free