Evidence Hub

Tailored Therapy vs. Empirical Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Andreev DN, Khurmatullina AR, Maev IV, Bordin DS, Zaborovsky AV, Kucheryavyy YA, Sokolov PS, Beliy PA

Journal of personalized medicine, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to provide the first umbrella review to systematically evaluate the evidence for the efficacy of personalized susceptibility-guided tailored therapy (TT) versus empirical therapy (ET) for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Methods: An umbrella review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute standards, registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251104335). A comprehensive literature search across MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, RSCI, and Google Scholar identified systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 1 January 1985 and 10 June 2025. Studies comparing TT and ET were included. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified AMSTAR-2 tool, GRADE, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBIS tool. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: A total of 7 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, covering 66 primary studies. TT was associated with a significantly higher eradication rate compared to ET (RR = 1.265; 95% CI: 1.137-1.407). In first-line treatment, TT showed consistent superiority (RR = 1.156; 95% CI: 1.117-1.196), which was further supported by high-quality meta-analyses (RR = 1.288; 95% CI: 1.022-1.624). The benefit in second-line therapy did not reach statistical significance (RR = 1.291; 95% CI: 0.834-1.999). The absolute eradication rates were 84.31% (95% CI: 80.94-87.41) for TT and 67.80% (95% CI: 58.48-76.46) for ET. Conclusions: TT is more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free