Evidence Hub

Exploring the opportunity for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and precision dose antimicrobials in an outpatient antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service: a prospective observational study

Wilson RC, Gilchrist MJ, Cele R, d'Arc S, Mills EA, Ndhlovu C, Balancio B, Arkell P et al.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026

39 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: Notwithstanding the wide uptake of outpatient antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in the UK, there is a paucity of data on antimicrobial exposure. We aimed to assess antimicrobial pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) for several agents in our service with a view to understanding a potential role for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and precision antimicrobial therapy in this setting.

Methods: The study was a prospective, observational, pilot PK-PD study. Adult patients receiving intravenous ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, daptomycin, ertapenem, flucloxacillin or teicoplanin, or oral treatment with linezolid were enrolled. Peak and trough blood samples were obtained. Total and unbound antibacterial concentrations were measured. Clinical details, laboratory findings and UK OPAT good practice recommendation metrics were extracted from the medical record. PK-PD was interpreted according to EUCAST rationale documents and other published guidance. Doses were not adjusted except for linezolid and teicoplanin.

Results: In total, 39 patients were recruited to the study, predominantly on ceftriaxone (21/39, 54%) or ertapenem (6/39, 15%). Four patients received (10%) teicoplanin, three (8%) ceftazidime, three (8%) flucloxacillin, one (3%) linezolid and one (3%) daptomycin. The most common reason for OPAT was bacteraemia and endocarditis (6/39; 15% each). PK-PD target attainment was acceptable for all drugs and dose regimens, and all β-lactam-based treatments met conservative PK-PD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 39 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free