Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Yao X, Zhang H, Lu X

Medicine, 2025

9,509 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: To investigate the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in patients with heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: A manual search was conducted in 3 prestigious English databases, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science, for studies published within the last decade, from July 2014 to July 2024. The extracted literature was synthesized to analyze the efficacy outcomes, survival prognostic indicators, and safety profiles of SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with HF and T2DM. The Cochrane bias risk assessment scale was used as a tool to evaluate the quality of the literature, and Review Manager 5.4 software was used to create the bias risk chart. Data analysis and merging were completed with the help of Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.0 statistical software.

Results: Twelve studies encompassing 9509 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that compared to the control group, the SGLT-2 inhibitor-treated group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index [mean difference (MD) = -7.25, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] (-9.83, -4.67)], brain natriuretic peptide levels [MD = -36.96, 95% CI (-63.51, -10.41)], and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [MD = -519.27, 95% CI (-660.77, -377.78)]. Furthermore, the SGLT-2 inhibitor-treated group exhibited significantly higher increases in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores [MD…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,509 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free