Evidence Hub

Abstract 14849: Lifetime Benefit of Empagliflozin in Extending Survival Free From Insulin Initiation in Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: An Actuarial Analysis of EMPA-REG OUTCOME

M. Vaduganathan, N. Sattar, D. Fitchett, A. Ofstad, M. Brueckmann, J. George, S. Verma, M. Mattheus et al.

Circulation, 2020

172 participants

Abstract

Background:

Many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) will, over time, require insulin therapy for glycemic control. Treatment-attendant adverse effects of insulin such as weight gain and hypoglycemia may be especially problematic in those with CVD. Delaying the need for insulin initiation may therefore be an important therapeutic goal, especially in those with CVD.

Methods:

This actuarial analysis evaluated the 3,633 (52%) of 7,020 EMPA-REG OUTCOME participants who were not using insulin at baseline. Patients were randomized to the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin (EMPA) 10mg, 25mg, or placebo (PBO). After the first 12 weeks, changes in background antihyperglycemic therapy were allowed. We estimated survival time free from insulin initiation (sustained over ≥2 consecutive study visits) over patients’ lifetimes by using baseline age as the time horizon. Age-based Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for each year of age between 45 and 80 years. Differences in area under the survival curve between treatment arms represented treatment effects on time spent alive and free from insulin initiation.

Results:

During median follow-up of 3.2 years, insulin was required in 172 patients (7.1%) with EMPA and 196 (16.4%) with PBO. Lifetime benefits on insulin-free survival were inversely related to baseline age, ranging from 1.4 to 11.3 years. For a 45-year-old, estimated insulin-free survival was 20.1 years with EMPA and 10.0 years with PBO (difference: 10.1 years; 95% CI 5.7-14.5…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 172 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free