Evidence Hub

Dapagliflozin does not impair microvascular hemorheology in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicenter randomized controlled trial (D-PATH study)

Nakatani Y, Banba N, Ono S, Turumi T, Hoshiai M, Sugiyama T, Tomoe T, Tamiya H et al.

Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026

82 participants

Abstract

Aims: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular and renal events beyond glucose lowering, but their hematocrit-raising effects raise concerns about increased blood viscosity and microvascular impairment. We investigated whether dapagliflozin adversely affects microvascular hemorheology in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 82 adults with type 2 diabetes received dapagliflozin (5 mg/day) or conventional therapy for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in whole blood passage time (WBPT), measured using a microchannel flow analyzer that simulates precapillary arterioles (7 × 7 μm), with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 6.0 s (15%). Secondary outcomes included apparent microvascular viscosity, adhesive leukocyte count, and oxidative stress markers. Serum erythropoietin (EPO) was evaluated in an ancillary analysis.

Results: WBPT changed minimally in the dapagliflozin group (+1.4 s; 95% CI, 0.0-2.9) and slightly decreased in the control group (-0.6 s; 95% CI, -1.9 to 0.6), yielding a between-group difference of 2.0 s (95% CI, -0.2 to 3.9), with the upper bound below the prespecified noninferiority margin. Microvascular viscosity, hematocrit-standardized viscosity, leukocyte adhesion, and oxidative stress markers remained stable in both groups. Dapagliflozin increased hematocrit and EPO, particularly in participants with lower baseline hematocrit, whereas those…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 82 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free