Evidence Hub

Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial on the Effect of Dapagliflozin in Patients With ADPKD Receiving Tolvaptan

Kiyotaka Uchiyama, Daisuke Kamano, T. Nagasaka, E. Hama, R. Shirai, Rena Sumura, Ei Kusahana, Akane Yanai et al.

Kidney International Reports, 2025

27 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

Introduction Although dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, delays the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), its effect on patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) has not been established. We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled crossover trial to evaluate the additive effects of dapagliflozin in patients with ADPKD receiving tolvaptan. Methods A total of 27 patients were randomly counterbalanced to receive dapagliflozin 10 mg or usual care without dapagliflozin for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the slope of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) determined by linear regression from 1 to 6 months, and the secondary endpoints included changes in total kidney volume (TKV). eGFR was calculated based on creatinine levels (eGFRcr), cystatin C levels (eGFRcys), and the mean of eGFRcr and eGFRcys (eGFRcr-cys). Results There were significant attenuations in the eGFRcr-cys and eGFRcys slopes during the dapagliflozin trial compared with the one without dapagliflozin (2.57 ± 7.88 vs. −5.65 ± 9.57 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, P = 0.002; 3.91 ± 11.40 vs. −8.43 ± 13.44 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, P = 0.003, respectively). Meanwhile, the eGFRcr slope was potentially moderate during the trial with dapagliflozin (1.03 ± 10.78 vs. −3.66 ± 8.88 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, P = 0.06). The 6-month change in TKV was significantly attenuated during the trial with dapagliflozin compared with the one without…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free