Evidence Hub

Therapeutic challenges in managing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection in a renal dysfunction patient: a case study and literature review

Fan X, Chen F, Ruan Z, Li L

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025

Abstract

Background: The overall infection rate of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has markedly increased over the past two decades, with its bloodstream infections being associated with poor clinical outcomes and high mortality rates. In patients with concomitant renal insufficiency, the complexity of anti-infective therapy is further heightened due to limited antibiotic options and altered pharmacokinetics, highlighting the critical importance of individualized treatment strategies.

Objective: This study aims to explore effective clinical treatment strategies for S. maltophilia-induced bloodstream infections in patients with renal insufficiency and to provide evidence-based support for optimizing antimicrobial decision-making.

Methods: We present a case of S. maltophilia bloodstream infection occurring in a patient with concomitant renal insufficiency. The choice of antimicrobial agents, dosage modifications, and combination therapy were systematically analyzed based on results from antimicrobial combination testing and observed clinical response. A comprehensive review of relevant literature was also conducted.

Results: Guided by the findings of antimicrobial combination testing, an individualized regimen consisting of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and aztreonam (ATM) was implemented, with dose adjustments tailored according to the patient's renal function. This approach led to the successful resolution of the infection. The literature review further supports that in patients with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free