Evidence Hub

Structured Nurse-Led PICU Liberation Bundle (ABCDEF) Discussion During Rounds: A Single-Center, Secondary Analysis of Pre- Vs. Post-Implementation Data From 2017

Oluwatomini A Fashina, Robert J. Kahoud, Gina M. Rohlik, Anna Mujic, Joshua Vu, Michael E. Nemergut, Nanette E Matzke, Devon O Aganga et al.

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Society of Critical Care Medicine PICU Liberation ABCDEF (A-F) Campaign Collaborative aimed to implement best practices for analgesia (A), breathing (B), comfort/consciousness (C), delirium (D), early mobilization (E), and family engagement and empowerment (F). Our post hoc study of Mayo Clinic data sought to compare the pre-implementation rounding process, which used a nursing script organized by organ systems, with a novel, liberation-focused rounding process emphasizing A-F bundle elements.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of pre- vs. post-implementation surveys collected by independent observers during rounds.

SETTING

Medical/surgical PICU in a quaternary-care, academic medical center during April to July 2017.

SUBJECTS

The observed participants included PICU physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, and dietitians.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Survey responses from 145 team members pre-implementation and 67 post-implementation showed improved team satisfaction, communication, and understanding of daily plans (all p < 0.05). Respondents reported an increased frequency of discussions on bundle components A-E (all p < 0.01). Observations of 41 pre-implementation and 46 post-implementation rounds showed an increase in the frequency of discussion of all components of the bundle (all p < 0.01). However, this finding was not at the expense of increased duration of individual rounds since we failed to find a difference in pre- vs.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free