Evidence Hub

The dilemma of antibiotic susceptibility and clinical decision-making in a multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection

Chen L, Qu X, Su J, Yao H, Yuan Q, Wang Y, Li N, Wu G et al.

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023

1 citation

Abstract

Objective: How to choose the appropriate antibiotics and dosage has always been a difficult issue during the treatment of multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections. Our study aims to resolve this difficulty by introducing our multi-disciplinary treatment (MDT) clinical decision-making scheme based on rigorous interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility tests and precise therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosage adjustment. Method: The treatment course of an elderly patient who developed a multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) bloodstream infection from a brain abscess was presented. Results: In the treatment process, ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) was used empirically for treating the infection and clinical symptoms improved. However, the follow-up bacterial susceptibility test showed that the bacteria were resistant to CAZ-AVI. Considering the low fault tolerance of clinical therapy, the treatment was switched to a 1 mg/kg maintenance dose of susceptible polymyxin B, and TDM showed that the AUC24h, ss of 65.5 mgh/L had been achieved. However, clinical symptoms were not improved after 6 days of treatment. Facing the complicated situation, the cooperation of physicians, clinical pharmacologists, and microbiologists was applied, and the treatment finally succeeded with the pathogen eradicated when polymyxin B dose was increased to 1.4 mg/kg, with the AUC24h, ss of 98.6 mgh/L. Conclusion: MDT collaboration on the premise of scientific and standardized drug…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free