Evidence Hub

Lack of symptomatic and long-term hemodynamic effects of prazosin in chronic heart failure. Double-blind, randomized study over one year

Reifart N, Schmidt-Moritz AD, Nadj M, Kaltenbach M, Bussmann WD

Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 1985

25 participants

Abstract

Long-term treatment of congestive heart failure with prazosin is disputed. Only few controlled trials have been reported so far. Our study is the first randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial over several months that also takes haemodynamic measurements into account. 25 patients with congestive heart failure classes III and IV (NYHA) received either prazosin 20 mg/d orally (n = 12) or placebo (n = 13) and were followed up closely. Before treatment, after 6 and after 12 months we performed echocardiography, heart volume (estimated by chest X-ray) and right heart catheterization at rest and during exercise. No significant differences could be noticed during follow-up concerning the following parameters: symptoms (NYHA), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, shortening fraction, heart volume and systemic vascular resistance. While diuretics could be reduced in 3 patients with placebo an increasing dose was necessary in 6 out of 12 patients of the prazosin group. Long-term treatment of congestive heart failure with prazosin may be valuable only in exceptional cases.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free