Use of pseudomonas immunoglobulin in ventilated patients at an interdisciplinary surgical intensive care station
Abstract
The clinical efficacy and safety of a new pseudomonas hyperimmune globulin for intravenous administration were examined in 30 patients in a prospective randomized study. Although the statistical evaluation of the measurable parameters did not show relevant differences between the therapy group (n = 15) and the controls (n = 15), the clinical course of the disease was markedly better in patients treated with hyperimmune globulin. In the control group, three patients died from Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, but none in the therapy group. The preparation was very well tolerated.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 30 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials
- Efficacy of personalized psychological interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effects of Lifestyle Interventions That Include a Physical Activity Component in Class II and III Obese Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis
- Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar depression in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.