Selection of patients with melanoma brain metastases for aggressive treatment
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors for patients with melanoma brain metastases that can be recommended for patient selection for clinical trials. A retrospective review was conducted of 65 patients irradiated for brain metastases from 1990 to 1997. Pretreatment factors analyzed for influence on survival included age, stage, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), extracranial metastases, the number and location of brain lesions, disease-free interval from initial diagnosis, total dose of radiation, and number of fractions administered. Prognosis was also analyzed by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analyses (RPA) classes. The data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median survival was 4 months. RPA class distribution was I-25%, II-48%, and III-28% with a median survival of 6.5, 3.5, and 2.5 months, respectively (p = 0.0098 by log-rank test). KPS less than 70% (p = 0.0039), and the presence of extracranial metastases (p = 0.03), predicted a worse prognosis on univariate analysis. Both factors remained significant on multivariate analysis. The prognosis of patients receiving radiotherapy for brain metastases is related to RPA class, the presence of extracranial metastases, and KPS. These criteria should be employed in selecting patients for aggressive protocol treatment, or for more protracted brain irradiation off protocol.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 65 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials
- Efficacy of personalized psychological interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Effects of Lifestyle Interventions That Include a Physical Activity Component in Class II and III Obese Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis
- Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials
- Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar depression in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.