Evidence Hub

Elizabethkingia miricola as an opportunistic oral pathogen associated with superinfectious complications in humoral immunodeficiency: a case report

Zdziarski P, Paściak M, Rogala K, Korzeniowska-Kowal A, Gamian A

BMC infectious diseases, 2017

28 citations

Abstract

Background: Elizabethkingia miricola is a rare Gram-negative bacterium found in water and clinical specimens. Typical culturing methods often misidentify Elizabethkingia spp. as Flavobacterium or Chryseobacterium. Although diagnosis is based on culturing samples taken from sterile sites, such as blood, a proper identification of this bacterium requires an expertise that goes beyond the capabilities of a typical clinical laboratory.

Case presentation: A 35-year-old woman diagnosed with common variable immunodeficiency was admitted to our center. Previous treatment with antibiotics (amoxicillin plus clavulanate, first and third generation of cephalosporins, macrolides) and systemic corticosteroids (up to 120 mg/day of prednisolone) failed to arrest the spread of inflammation. Gingival recession was observed in her oral cavity, resulting in an apparent lengthening of her teeth. In addition to typical commensal bacteria, including streptococci and neisseriae, strains of Rothia mucilaginosa and Elizabethkingia miricola were identified upon a detailed microbiological examination using a MALDI-TOF MS Biotyper system. The presence of the latter strain correlated with severe periodontitis, lack of IgA in her saliva and serum, a very low IgG concentration ( 500 mg/dl) and targeted levofloxacin treatment resulted in immune system reconstitution, oral healing, and eradication of the Elizabethkingia infection.

Conclusions: E. miricola rarely causes disease in healthy individuals.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free